elect a mod

do it. no one who hasn't been here longer than 2 months, and they need over 200 posts.

Luajh

idk, you just closed the registration, so i would wait a little longer to have a election, let people get to know others and see who is trustworthy and who isn't it.

Harvey Glynn wrote:

Luajh

idk hes not on here that much anymore...

nobody is except mansur wisa, toastycornflakes, and zanthos but the dont have 200 or been on here for two months

It's not about how long they've been here, or how many posts they have. They need to know how forums work, and no have any enemies, etc.

toastycornflakes wrote:

It's not about how long they've been here, or how many posts they have. They need to know how forums work, and no have any enemies, etc.

which all comes from experiance

You need to know how forums work. You should lock a thread if someone bumps an old thread, you should move threads when necessary, you should delete spam, ban when necessary, and do it all when needed.

toastycornflakes wrote:

You need to know how forums work. You should lock a thread if someone bumps an old thread, you should move threads when necessary, you should delete spam, ban when necessary, and do it all when needed.

yes, we know the responsibilities but your putting all this in the wrong post we are trying to nominate people

I think that I'd make a good mod, even though I have less than 200 posts. I also think that other members, like AndrewOstrom and ablair would be excellent mods. Andrew is legit and a good guy. Ablair helps people with their fb'ing problems.

actually I have almost 300 posts.

boffey ftw!

ablair helps me too. and i get on at least 3 times a day.

soomuchstyle wrote:

ablair helps me too. and i get on at least 3 times a day.

Yeah i like ablair too and why does it matter that ur on 3 times a day?

Zanthos wrote:

actually I have almost 300 posts.

^ thanks dude,

but zanthos you havnt been on for two months

I know that I was just making the statement, correcting the post "but none of them have 200 posts or have been on for two months."

oh sorry what i meant was that none of them meet the qualifications

I don't think registration date should matter, but more about maturity level and how well they uphold the rules.

I sorta think i should be a mod
Ive been a member on here for along time now and I now the rules and i dont believe ive really broke them
I'm one of the few long time/loyal members to this form, most other people are on here on and off
Idk i just think im a willing candidate to be mod and i hope everyone else agrees

But... Your... Respected... Member... A... Rarity...

What? I know I'm a respected member. That only means I've been loyal to the forum and Ive been here awhile and followed the rules and gained the respect of the mods and admins
I just feel i can do more to help the forum as a mod and help clean it up

Jonathon. I vote jonathon above myself!

Yeah jonathan is good, as long as he promises to be on here more, sure he's on here a good amount but not multiple times a day, it could just be becuase I don't see him because if a tine change or something rhough

Homer wrote:

boffey ftw!

Thanks, actually im on the forum quite alot, im on here at least once a day and ive been on here quite a while amd im experienced with forums

i vote Jonathon

^ yeah boffey is pretty good, but doesn't have the 200 posts thing,
how many mods are we electing? i think we need two! like i said if jonathan was on here a little more hes perfect

ablair wrote:

if jonathan was on here a little more hes perfect

^agreed.
I said the respected member thing because I wanted to know if he really felt that he could do more with mod privileges than in his current position.